Francis Maude: I am today publishing a report on Departments' and agencies' performance on handling Members' and peers' correspondence during the calendar year 2010. Details are set out in the attached table. Correspondence statistics for 2009 can be found on 16 March 2010, Official Report, 47-50WS.
	Departmental figures are based on substantive replies unless otherwise indicated.
	The footnotes to the table provide general background information on how the figures have been compiled.
	
		
			 Correspondence from MP/ Peers to Ministers and Agency Chief Executives in 2010 
			 Correspondence from MP/ Peers to Ministers and Agency Chief Executives(1) 2010 
			 Department or Agency Target set for reply (working days) Number of letters received % of replies within target 
			 Attorney-General's Office 20 150 73 
			 Department for Business, Innovation and Skills 15 13243 71 
			 Companies House 10 109 100 
			 Insolvency Service 10 42 64 
			 Cabinet Office 15 3048 58(2) 
			 Charity Commission 10 143 70 
			 Department for Communities and Local Government 15 9117 77 
			 Planning Inspectorate 7(3) 236 85 
			 Crown Prosecution Service 20 460 98 
			 Department for Culture, Media and Sport 20 4006 96(5) 
			 Royal Parks(4) 10 20 95 
			 Ministry of Defence 15 6072 77 
			 Met Office 10 15 87 
			 Service Personnel and Veterans Agency 15 125 96 
			 Department for Education 15 18512 42(6) 
			 Department of Energy and Climate Change 15 6343 69 
			 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 15 10944 83 
			 Animal Health 15 121 95 
			 Rural Payments Agency 15 552 63 
			 Food Standards Agency
			 DH Ministers replies 20 1081 83 
			 FSA Chair/CE replies 20 121 83 
			 Meat Hygiene Service(7) 15 18 100 
			 Foreign and Commonwealth Office 20 9845 90 
			 Government Equalities Office 20 666 80 
			 Department of Health 20 17733 97 
			 Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency 20 318 98(*) 
			  20 38 92(**) 
			 *Agency Ministerial cases **Letters sent directly to agency chief executive or where agency chief executives responded on behalf of Ministers
			 Home Office 15 13532 56(8) 
			 Criminal Records Bureau 10 1072 70(9) 
			 Identity and Passport Service 10 1014 87 
			 UK Border Agency 20 57651 88 
			 Department for International Development 15 3163 95 
			 Ministry of Justice 15 4084 78 
			 HM Courts Service 15 939 80 
			 HM Land Registry 15 109 78 
			 National Archives 15 36 92 
			 National Offender Management Service 15 1190 70(*) 
			  20 348 89(**) 
			 Office of the Public Guardian 15 191 89 
			 Official Solicitor and Public Trustee 15 43 79 
			 Tribunals Service 15 264 86 
			 *Where Ministers replied ** Where CEO replied
			 Northern Ireland Office 15 649 78 
			 Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Schools 15 149 88 
			 Office of Fair Trading 15 471 66 
			 Office of Gas and Electricity Markets 15 160 77 
			 Office of the Leader of the House of Commons 15 218 83 
			 Office of the Leader of the House of Lords 15 35 89 
			 Office of Rail Regulation 20 70 84 
			 OFWAT (Water Services Regulation Authority) 10 92 70 
			 Postal Services Commission 5 11 73 
			 Scotland Office 15 88 68 
			 Serious Fraud Office 20 43 83 
			 Department for Transport 15 8359 74 
			 Driver Vehicle Licensing Agency 7 1622 99 
			 Driving Standards Agency 10 158 100 
			 Highways Agency 15 371 93 
			 Maritime and Coastguard Agency 10 21 95 
			 Vehicle and Operator Services Agency 10 86 97 
			 HM Treasury 15 10811 51(10) 
			 H M Revenue and Customs 15 4028 75 
			 HMRC CEO(*) 15 729 50 
			 *Cases where the HMRC's chief executive has replied directly, rather than Ministers
			 Treasury Solicitor's Department 10 23 96 
			 Wales Office 15 131 82 
			 Department for Work and Pensions 20 19020 85 
			 Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission 15 3967 99 
			 Debt Management 15 28 86 
			 Health and Safety Executive 15 93 92 
			 Jobcentre Plus 15 3195 94 
			 Pension, Disability and Carers Service 15 2047 100 
			 (1) Departments and Agencies which received 10 MPs/Peers letters or fewer are not shown in this table. Holding or interim replies are not included unless otherwise indicated. The report does not include correspondence considered as freedom of information requests. Includes correspondence received from prospective parliamentary candidates. (2) Performance has been affected by a 111% rise in correspondence following the formation of the new Government and machinery of government changes. Measures have been put in place to improve performance in 2011. (3) With effect from 1 July, response target revised to seven working days. (4) Response target reduced to 10 working days with effect from  1 September. (5) From 28 June 2010 performance was monitored on 2537 letters received to departmental targets of two working days (46% achieved) and 10 working days (82%) achieved). (6) DFE received an increase of 20% in correspondence received compared to the previous year (35% increase for May to December compared to the same period in the previous year) contributing to a downturn in performance. The Department is investing in new processes and resources to ensure improvement in 2011. Includes correspondence sent to the former DCSF. (7) The Meat Hygiene Service was dissolved on 31 March. (8) The drop in HO performance is attributed to a number of new policies being developed as well as policy areas being reviewed which resulted in a temporary delay in replies being sent. (9) CRB experienced a 56% increase in correspondence during the fourth quarter of 2010. (10) Includes correspondence received by OGC, NS&I and the Valuation Office. Performance increased in the first six months of the year to average 64%. The Election, Emergency Budget, Autumn Statement and the Spending Review public consultation exercise increased correspondence levels, resulting in a temporary drop in performance. Correspondence levels are expected to remain high but with a departmental focus on improving performance taking place.

Christopher Huhne: I was unable to attend the Council because of Cabinet business in London. Andy Lebrecht, Deputy Permanent Representative to the EU, represented the UK at the Council.
	The extraordinary Energy Council began with a report by the Energy Commissioner of the impact of events in north Africa and Japan on the EU's energy market. Although there had been no significant impact on supplies as a result of events in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya, there had been an impact on prices. The EU had 120 days of oil supply. Saudi Arabia and Russia had undertaken to cover any shortfalls in gas and oil supplies. There was general agreement that oil and gas markets were functioning well and that it was important to take a calm approach to reassure the market. The Council concluded that although there was no immediate problem with energy supply, the EU should take measures to increase its ability to deal with problems in the future, in line with the priorities agreed at the European Energy Council on 4 February.
	The Commissioner then reported on the situation in Japan; and on the role of nuclear in the energy mix of the EU. He noted the right of member states to decide upon their own energy mix and that nuclear would continue to play a large role in the EU for the foreseeable future. He proposed that member states should work together to develop and approve an EU safety check for nuclear power plants. The UK agreed on the importance of a measured response based on the evidence and on lessons learned from the events in Japan. Most member states supported this position.
	The Council concluded that the EU response to the situation in Japan should involve comprehensive risk and safety assessments ("stress tests") of nuclear power plants in Europe with full involvement of member states in determining how this should be done. EU neighbouring countries should also be involved in the assessment, as well as international bodies such as the G20 and the International Atomic Energy Agency. The EU should maintain high standards of nuclear safety, with a continual process of improvement. The Council agreed that communication with the public on these issues should be open and transparent.

Caroline Spelman: Today I am publishing the framework document for the new Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency (AHVLA) being created on 1 April by the merger of two existing Executive agencies, Animal Health and the Veterinary Laboratories Agency (AHVLA) which I announced on 29 June 2010.
	The new agency will be an Executive agency of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs with the same remit as its predecessor bodies. In addition to its UK role and commercial activities it will help deliver the animal health and welfare strategy (GB) through regulatory and advisory activities and the provision of excellent science.
	Copies of the framework have been made available in the Libraries of both Houses and it will also be placed on the Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency's website.

Philip Hammond: Following consultation with the Mayor of London, I have today determined the Greater London Authority Transport Grant for 2011-12 at £2,804 million.
	This grant is provided by the Government to Transport for London to deliver transport services and investment in the capital, including London Underground.
	In line with my 20 October 2010 letter to the Mayor "Spending Review 2010: TfL funding agreement", £861 million of this grant is designated an investment grant to support delivery of the schemes and milestones, notably upgrade of the tube, set out in annex B of my 20 October letter, and the remaining £1,943 million is a general grant for the purposes of TfL.

Steve Webb: My hon. Friend, the Under-Secretary of State, responsible for welfare reform, Lord Freud of Eastry, has made the following statement.
	The Government announced in last October's comprehensive spending review that it would extend the housing benefit shared accommodation rate to people under the age of 35 from 2012. This rate currently applies to people under the age of 25 and reflects the costs of renting non-self-contained accommodation in the private sector where the tenant has exclusive use of a bedroom but shares other facilities such as a bathroom.
	We intend to bring forward these changes by three months so that they start to take effect from January 2012.
	The local housing allowance reforms, to be introduced from this April, cap the level of payments to a maximum of a four bedroom rate and reduce local housing allowance rates so that they are based on the 30th percentile of rents rather than the median. They also introduce overall caps on the rate of local housing allowance for one, two, three and four-bedroom accommodation. Existing customers will be given up to nine months transitional protection from these reforms starting from the anniversary date of their claim.
	By introducing the shared accommodation rate changes slightly earlier, this will bring the timing of the shared accommodation rate change more closely into line with the local housing allowance reforms for existing customers. It will ensure that single people aged 25 to 34 reaching the end of their transitional protection period will experience at that point a single reduction in their housing benefit, rather than two separate reductions.
	That is why we have decided to bring forward the shared accommodation rate changes. We will publicise these proposed changes through appropriate channels to make sure that those affected are aware of them in advance.

Maria Miller: Equality 2025 is a non-departmental public body of publicly appointed disabled people, which was established in December 2006.
	The group offers strategic, confidential advice to Government on issues that affect disabled people. This advice can include participation in the very early stages of policy development, or in-depth examination of existing policy. The group works with Ministers and senior officials across Government.
	Rowen Jade chaired Equality 2025 from 1 December 2008 to 2 September 2010, when she sadly passed away. This recruitment exercise took place to find a candidate to continue Rowen's good work.
	The recruitment exercise was carried out in accordance with the Commissioner for Public Appointments' code of practice. The quality of applicants for the post was exceptionally high. I am pleased to announce the successful candidate and new chair of Equality 2025 from l April 2011 is Dr Rachel Perkins.
	Rachel Perkins has been a member of Equality 2025 since 1 April 2010. I am confident she will lead the group forward during an interesting and challenging time.